Just For Future Reference …

Thursday, 2008-February-14 at 20:07

I heard somebody say (an official at a government-sponsored workshop)

… interoperability doesn’t mean that everyone has the same radio ….

Classic.  We already know that interoperability is in designing our radio systems to work together, no matter who made them.  There are even government grants that are given to local safety agencies to help them build that capacity into their systems.

So tell me again how OOXML is designed for interoperability.  Is it designed with the needs of any other software vendor's products in mind?  Does it abstract away enough details of the in-memory representations to enable competing implementations to be just as capable?  Are the "IP" conditions workable for producers of competing and alternate implementations of office-type functionality?

Maybe somebody at the Burton Group ought to read this.  Then again, even after someone corrects their errors [PDF], they still cannot admit they were wrong.

Entry filed under: ODF, Open Standards. Tags: , .

Vote For Openness FLOSS Progressing At DoD


RSS Slingshot

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Unknown Feed

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Unknown Feed

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Owner Managed Business

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Archives

Recent Posts

Blog Stats

  • 596,905 hits

SUBSCRIBE


%d bloggers like this: